Frequently Asked Questions
BROWN’S GAS (aka. BG, HHO and HydrOxy)
A. Eagle-Research defines Brown’s Gas (aka BG, HHO or HydrOxy) as:
“A mixture of combustible gasses coming out of an electrolyzer that is specifically designed to electrolyze (split) water and to NOT separate the resulting gasses from each other.”
Electrolysis splits water into hydrogen and oxygen by inserting two electrodes into a solution containing a catalyst and water; then running direct current through the solution.
Hydrogen evolves from the negative electrode (cathode) and oxygen evolves from the positive electrode (anode). There are many catalyst choices.
The difference between traditional and Brown’s Gas (BG) electrolyzers is a ‘membrane’ in the solution between the cathode and anode.
The membrane traditionally separates the hydrogen and oxygen into two separate streams.
BG electrolyzers do not have a membrane, so all gasses generated come out the same hose.
Because there is no membrane to interrupt the process, the BG electrolysis can make a third gas, a negatively charged plasma form of water (H2O with extra electrons we call Electrically Expanded Water (ExW)), evolving directly out of the solution (not associated with either electrode); making the BG uniquely different from a traditional H2:O2 mixture.
Brown’s Gas is a ratio of 2 parts hydrogen to 1 part oxygen and usually contains a significant water vapor component.
Brown’s Gas is made using water and electricity in specially designed electrolyzers, like our AquaCure.
Research indicates that Brown’s Gas has characteristics that cannot be achieved by simply mixing bottled hydrogen and oxygen in a stoichiometric ratio.
BG contains H, H2, O, O2, H2O (as water vapor) and a special 6th ‘structured’ gas that shows up in ‘dried gas’ as water vapor; https://eagle-research.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Browns-Gas-Spectroscopy.pdf
Chris Eckman calls this 6th constituent “linear water isomer with extra electrons, stable in a Rydberg Cluster”, professor Ruggero Santilli calls them ‘Magnecules’ and George Wiseman calls it ‘Electrically Expanded Water’ (ExW) ExW is a negatively charged plasma form of water.
Matter exists in 4 ‘states’ Solid, Liquid, Gas and Plasma.
The 4th state of water (ExW) seems to act like a ‘glue’ that holds ‘structures’ of water together, which is why we think atomic oxygen and hydrogen can exist in a stable form. These structures of H and O atoms (Yull Brown called a fluid crystal) can be large enough to be heavier than air.
ExW gives Brown’s Gas unique properties associated with extra electrons… Like voltage generation or increasing EZ (Exclusion Zone) Gel formation.
Here is a 2019 Presentation, George Wiseman gave at an international conference on water in Germany.
Here are George Wiseman’s early theories of what Brown’s Gas may be…
Here is George Wiseman’s 2017 presentation.
Note that he introduced the initial version of AquaCure at ‘less than cost’ to get beta testers. The feedback gave us the AquaCure we have today.
BG is also known under brand names like: Common-Ducted Gas, Rhode’s Gas, Spirig Gas, HydrOxy, Brown Gas, Green Gas, Klein Gas, Aquygen, HHO, SG Gas, Ohmasa Gas, Knallgas, HNG and (erroneously by WikiPedia) OxyHydrogen.
Here is a research synopsis from Moray King
Water Electrolyzers and Zero-Point Energy
Here is a peer-reviewed discussion about Brown’s Gas for health:
http://www.waterjournal.org/volume-11/mohaupt
OxyHydrogen is the name of mixed molecular hydrogen (H2) and molecular oxygen (O2) in ratio of 2H2:O2, as you can achieve by mixing bottled gasses OR by electrolyzers with a membrane that separates the hydrogen and oxygen, such as PEM:SPE electrolyzers; which OFTEN erroneously call their mixture ‘Brown’s Gas…
Just mixing pure hydrogen and oxygen is NOT Brown’s Gas because it does not contain the electron rich ExW.
https://eagle-research.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Spanish-Study.docx
Short History of Browns Gas
Brown’s Gas was originally patented in the 1960’s
https://patents.google.com/patent/US3310483A/en
The late William Rhodes, of Pheonix Arizona, was awarded the patent 3,310,483 for ‘Multicell OxyHydrogen Generator’ on March 21, 1967 and he called it ‘single-ducted gas‘.
Not much happened with the gas until the late Yull Brown (then in Australia) in the 1970’s patented his own machine for making it.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US4014777A/en
and started to commercialize the gas for various applications (mostly to replace torch fuel gasses like acetylene). He spent the next 30 years of his life traveling the world, selling his technology and developing variations of his machines.
Yull Brown was particularly effective in the Orient, where China (in particular) was undergoing a MASSIVE buildup and they adopted the Brown’s Gas as a standard welding gas instead of developing an acetylene infrastructure.
During most of that time the single-ducted gas was generally known as ‘Brown’s Gas‘.
After that, several people started making variations of Brown’s Gas machines and many of them ‘brand-named’ the gas (it’s all the same gas) to try to get unique market share.
The first variation was HydrOxy, from Alvin Crosby of New Zealand, who was a distributor of Yull Brown but was unhappy with Yull’s machine’s design and made a better one.
I’ve been working with Brown’s Gas since 1986 and I’ve used the name ‘Brown’s Gas’ to honor the inventor that commercialized it AND because it’s important (less confusion) to keep the same name for the same gas.
The world would NOT know of this gas if it wasn’t for Yull Brown’s effort over the last 30 years of his life.
My version of a Brown’s Gas electrolyzer was half the weight, half the size and produced more gas with half the electricity. It also was simpler, more manufacturable and safer to use.
The name HHO popped into existence via the late Denny Klein just before the huge raise in oil prices in 2007-2008. Denny was featured on FOX News at the time, so the gas got a lot of good publicity with the trade name HHO.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Rb_rDkwGnU
One of the excellent applications of BG is for combustion enhancement (typical 25% reduction in fuel consumption) so when Ozzie Freeman put out an eBook on how to DIY apply HHO to your vehicle and sold over a million copies, the name HHO was then ‘cemented’ in the public consciousness.
There’s lots more to the history, but that’s the gist.
All the ‘trade names’ are for the same gas,
… though Brown’s Gas can vary in QUALITY depending on the quantity (percentage) of Electrically Expanded Water (ExW) contained in the mixture.
More George Wiseman Brown’s Gas Presentations:
2007 Nexus Conference
2019 TeslaTech
2019 Water Conference in Germany
Some of George Wiseman’s Brown’s Gas Interviews:
With Mark Kent and Dr. Jon Xue Zhang
With Mark Kent and Clive De Carle
With Greg Carlwood of HigherSideChats Folllowup Show
With Kevin Shelton of Epigeneering
With Justin Stellman of Extreme Health Radio
Justin Stellman of Extreme Health Radio #3 (EP #734)
With Odessa Orlewicz of Librti part 1
With Odessa Orlewicz of Librti part 2 (Q&A)
Librti June 29, 2022 (further Q&A)
With Lynnie Wennerstrom of LynnieMotivates.com
With Andrew Scheim of Blue Z Water
With Benjamin Balderson of Odin’s Alchemy
With David Drimmel of Healevations
The Crow Show (all episodes with George Wiseman)
With Chance Garton of InnerVerse
Conversations with Dr. Tom Cowan
The Hellenic Wolf videos: Full, Patents, Intro, History, ExW,
AlfaVedic with Dr. Barre Lando and Mike Winters
Conversation with Prof. Gerald Pollack and Mark Kent
STERN (anti-Cancer) WEBINAR 1 WHY Brown’s Gas is better than pure hydrogen
Vonu PodCast (Brown’s Gas as a potential energy source)
Advertisement: Interview with Jordan Jay of United Fight Alliance
We have discovered that Brown’s Gas has the potential to affect every area of our lives. It can lower our cost of living, improve our health, allow our civilization to stop pollution, reverse existing pollution and provide huge economic gains.
A reader put together this series of videos to show some of the uses of Brown’s Gas.
Here I have written about Brown’s Gas for Health.
Another example is when using Brown’s Gas instead of traditional industrial gasses (like acetylene) for cutting, preheating, welding, soldering, brazing, etc. it lowers the fuel cost by as much as 98%, while doing the work faster, easier and with much higher quality results. Also, the exhaust is water, absolutely no pollution. See a profile of using Brown’s Gas for cutting steel(Note to fix link).
Examples of ‘traditional’ applications are listed on www.watertorch.com
Spectro-analysis shows that HydrOxy contains monatomic hydrogen and oxygen but it’s only about 3% of the total volume.
Evidence indicates that HydrOxy also contains a significant volume of Electrically Expanded Water (ExW).
We theorize that ExW is a negatively charged (electron rich) cold plasma form of water.
Depending on the quality of the HydrOxy gas, ExW can be up to 30% of the total volume.
Learn more at “What is Brown’s Gas”?
ExW is still water (hasn’t split into hydrogen and oxygen) but it’s water that’s soaked up electricity and become a gaseous form of water that is NOT water vapor or steam. If cooled, it does not condense. It only ‘condenses’ back into liquid water if it loses it’s electrons.
Plasma is the fourth state of matter (solid, liquid, gas, plasma) and is defined as an ‘ionized gas’ (has extra electrons).
ExW is water (H2O) in a gaseous form that has excess energy (in the form of bio-available electrons). It’s a plasma at room temperature so it’s a ‘cold’ plasma.
Here’s the page where George Wiseman describes his original discovery in 1996:
ExW forms in electrolyzers specifically designed to NOT separate the gasses. As per the video to the right:
ExW forms in the middle of the liquid, between the electrodes and if you insert a ‘membrane’ to separate the gases (like traditional electrolyzers do) then the ExW forming ‘effect’ (water absorbing electrons) doesn’t happen.
So the only way I know to make the ExW, is to make and keep all the gasses together (NO membrane)…
We can confirm the existence of and measure the volume of ExW in Brown’s Gas by drying the gas (to remove water moisture) and use mass spectrometry to see that a gaseous form of water (that is not water vapor or steam) is still there (it will not condense if cooled).
That’s the most direct way to confirm the existence of the ExW.
These tests were done independently of me in the 1990’s and I only recently (a couple of years ago) received the permission to post the results. They are shown in my 2017 TeslaTech Presentation.
ExW is what makes Brown’s Gas (aka HHO, HydrOxy, etc.) more effective for health application than using straight molecular hydrogen (H2).
Because the body (and particularly bodies that are ill) NEEDS the energy (electrons) that the ExW provides. The ExW literally GIVES the body ENERGY it needs to mitigate free radicals, stop oxidative cascade, stop cytokine, help RBCs carry oxygen, stop excessive inflammation and generally help the body heal.
Bodies that are ill usually have compromised energy generation systems and their energy reserves have been depleted. Adding energy INDEPENDENTLY of those systems allows the body to heal and re-start it’s own energy generation systems.
It’s good to give the body the food (hydrogen) it needs to heal, but it also helps if you give the body the ENERGY it needs to use the ‘food’ to heal.
It’s like any construction site. You can bring the concrete and lumber, but without electricity and fuel no machines can operate, the construction can’t proceed without energy. The ExW provides the fuel the body needs to heal quicker.
Bodies that are ill usually have compromised energy generation systems and have used up their energy reserves. So the ExW is needed for best results…
Another VITAL effect of ExW, is to help maintain the EZ Gel in all the circulatory system. Without EZ Gel, life simply couldn’t exist. EZ Gel (popularly known as EZ Water) is not water, it is H3O2- (a Gel that is not H2O) but it is spontaneously formed FROM water when water meets most hydrophilic surfaces. EZ Gel (H3O2-) is about phase 1.5 (between a solid and a liquid).
ExW is the ACTUAL Fourth Phase of Water… Materials generally have 4 recognized phases, Solid, liquid, gaseous and plasma. Water’s phases are named ice, water, steam and ExW.; during all these phases water remans as H2O molecule. ExW is a negatively charged (extra electrons) gaseous (plasma) form of water (H2O).
ExW gives water another way to increase the EZ Gel formation (by providing the electrons needed). Science is proving ExW makes Brown’s Gas about 30% more therapeutically effective over pure hydrogen and we theorize that the reason is the inclusion of the ExW.
Of course most people do not know about ExW.
The BEST (current) way to ‘measure’ the ExW is by inference. The machines produce too much gas.
So the gas production is ‘over-unity’ when you compare the electrical input to the gas production using Faraday Law.
For example, the ER50 is 130% efficient. So this ‘extra gas’ is the ExW. We are not ‘breaking’ or ‘violating’ or ‘disproving’ Faraday Laws. The ExW is formed independently of the Faraday Equations.
When using spectroanlysis and chromaphotography the ExW shows up as ‘dry’ water vapor (it’s WATER in a gaseous form that does not condense).
Note: There are many people out there touting EZ water as the fourth state of water. This is incorrect. But it’s ‘caught on’ as per:
And when I say the ExW is the Fourth Phase of Water I’m not comparing ExW to (Professor Gerald Pollack’s) EZ water.
I am saying that ExW is an ACTUAL fourth Phase of Water.
Gerald Pollack’s EZ ‘water’ is an interface phenomenon. I’ve conversed with Gerald Pollack asking WHY he called EZ water the ‘Fourth Phase of Water’ in his literature and and he said
“We were trying to figure out a good name. The term “exclusion zone” (EZ) was first suggested, and it seems to have caught on; but, it refers to a “zone” rather than to a substance. So, it’s not ideal.
Others call it H3O2, which is the putative chemical formula. That’s OK, but maybe somewhat arcane?”
He and I went on to confirm that EZ water was NOT ACTUALLY the fourth phase of water because
1. EZ water is H3O2, so it is not water, not H2O (any more than H2O2, hydrogen peroxide is water) and
2. EZ ‘water’ is not a plasma; the fourth phase of matter is plasma.
3. EZ water is a gel-like or semi-crystalline form of water.
(I’d call it water phase 1.5 because it is in-between solid and liquid)
Both Gerald Pollack and I define actual water as H2O.
H2O as matter exists in four phases; solid (ice), liquid (water), gas (steam or water vapor) and plasma (ionized gas or ExW).
Adding electrons (to make a negatively charged plasma) does not count as changing a molecule’s atoms, it’s simply a higher energy state of the same matter.
EZ water is an AMAZING discovery but is not the fourth phase of water (a plasma). It could be considered another ‘phase of water’ in that is a ‘phase of water’ that forms in certain conditions (water associated with hydrophilic material combined with infrared energy).
ExW is a negative plasma (extra electrons) form of water. It is water (still H2O) in a gaseous form that is not water vapor or steam (it does not condense when cooled).
Gerald Pollack and I have talked and agreed on this.
ExW (water as plasma) is an ACTUAL fourth phase of water.
Making something from water, by adding or subtracting atoms, makes it ‘not water’, not H2O.
EZ ‘water’ (H3O2) is a substance made from water by adding hydrogen and oxygen atoms…
but so is hydrogen peroxide H2O2.
No one would mistake hydrogen peroxide as ‘water’.
It turns out that the plasma form of water (ExW) is very healthful and synergistically increases the effectiveness of hydrogen by adding bio-available ENERGY to the body.
As far as hydrogen ‘kicking oxygen out of water’… that depends on the partial pressure gas laws and absorption capability of water. It’s true that if you feed pure hydrogen into water, it will ‘kick some oxygen out’.
But if you feed a mixed gas into water, the water will absorb the ALL the gasses in proportions according to the gas and absorption laws. Water will absorb much more oxygen than hydrogen (that’s why fish can breathe).
If hydrogen knocked out the oxygen, then why did these fish not only live (breathe), but grow to three times the size of their siblings in the same timeframe?
Two tanks, one bubbled with normal air, one bubbled with Brown’s Gas. Then the fish combined into the one tank for direct comparison.
These sorts of experiments prove beyond doubt that BG is healthful, with measurable and quantifiable results…
I work hard to make the safest and most practical BG electrolyzers on earth… And to shed light on miss-understandings and myth-conceptions.
Of course no one who knows Faraday Electrolysis would believe in ExW or the ‘line of bubbles’.
The ExW is formed ‘outside’ of the Faraday electrolysis, as a ‘side effect’ of the design of a Brown’s Gas electrolyzer.
ExW will not form in a traditional Faraday electrolyzer or in ‘modern’ versions like PEM.
I have video of the ‘line of bubbles’
I have spectrographic tests showing that ‘water’ still exists in the BG, AFTER water vapor has been removed.
ExW is plasma form of water that does NOT condense if cooled. I have ‘volume tests’ that show up to 50% more ‘gas’ production than should be possible using Faraday equations. See most of this in my 2017 Tesla Tech lecture.
We have discovered that Brown’s Gas has the potential to affect every area of our lives. It can lower our cost of living, improve our health, allow our civilization to stop pollution, reverse existing pollution and provide huge economic gains.
A reader put together this series of videos to show some of the uses of Brown’s Gas.
Here I have written about Brown’s Gas for Health.
Another example is when using Brown’s Gas instead of traditional industrial gasses (like acetylene) for cutting, preheating, welding, soldering, brazing, etc. it lowers the fuel cost by as much as 98%, while doing the work faster, easier and with much higher quality results. Also, the exhaust is water, absolutely no pollution. See a profile of using Brown’s Gas for cutting steel(Note to fix link).
Examples of ‘traditional’ applications are listed on www.watertorch.com
Is there a difference between Brown’s Gas and the HHO gas produced by standard electrolysis?
No, they are essentially identical. There are many names for Brown’s Gas, as people have attempted to ‘claim’ the gas as their own, usually to try to (inappropriately) patent it to fraud investors; or to ‘distance’ themselves from Brown’s Gas history.
I define Brown’s Gas as:
“The entire mixture of gasses coming out of an electrolyzer that is specifically designed to electrolyze (split) water and to NOT separate the resulting gasses from each other.”
The only difference between all these ‘names’ is the quality of the gas, how much quantity of Electrically Expanded Water (ExW) is produced.
https://www.eagle-research.com/browngas/whatisbg/watergas.php
The quantity of ExW is determined by many factors and has nothing to do with the ‘name’ of the gas or any particular electrolyzer design.
https://www.eagle-research.com/cms/faq/12
Some electrolyzers are more efficient at making ExW than others, and these show a higher gas production efficiency. Our electrolyzer technology can now produce BG using less than 1 watthour per STP liter.
I do not yet know how to measure the quantity of ExW in BG, but electrolyzers that produce a lot of gas, (overunity by Faraday Law) are certainly making the most ExW.
I mean if I would build my own electrolyzer according to your BG brochures, would I get a gas with different qualities that I get from my current, standard electrolyzer?
I do not know the efficiency of your current electrolyzer.
A higher quantity of ExW will produce more of the ‘special effects’ of BG.
First, there is a lot of miss-information about Lye on the internet. It seems like the Vested Interest doesn’t want people to use it anymore.
I’ve even seen supposed pictures of Lye burns (on Wikipedia) that are actually caused by Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) not Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH).
I know this because I’ve worked with concentrated lye solutions for almost 60 years. I’ve literally been SOAKED with lye solution when a chamber we were working on spilled it all over me. It was at least 15 minutes before I could take off my clothes and shower. I didn’t even get a rash.
Second, lye is one of the most common chemicals in existence. It’s used in hundreds of products and processes. It forms naturally in the environment whenever there is a forest fire (Lye can be acquired by leaching water through wood ashes).
In the past (for hundreds of thousands of years, until modern chemicals replaced it) it was used to make soap and it was acquired (made) by simply pouring water through wood ashes and evaporating the water.
In other words, lye is the active ingredient in soap, as God originally intended us to use and we did use since the beginning of time.
You mix up the lye just like mixing Kool-Aid and the concentration I use (about 1% by weight) is no stronger than soap (which you could use it for if you wanted). Our ancestors mixed lye with fats or oils to make soap bars.
Lye can be acquired by draining water through wood ashes, then evaporating the water. So lye is a 100% natural substance that nature uses to prevent acidity in water after forest fires. Nature NEEDS it for health of everything.
Today lye is commonly found in homes as drain cleaner, oven cleaner, etc…
Of course at MUCH higher concentrations than the AquaCure uses and people are not afraid of those household products…
I started using Brown’s Gas for heath purposes in 2005 and I’ve been inhaling it for a minimum of 4 hours (sometimes up to 8 hours) every day since March of 2016 WITHOUT using a Humidifier, I just bubble through my Drinking Water jar, then drink the water.
I DESIGNED the AquaCure to have ONLY pure gas to be inhaled. The Humidifier is redundant backup safety that I don’t even use in my own home machine.
There is ZERO chance of inhaling lye if you even follow just the spirit of the instructions of my Operation Manual and Updates.
I have many thousands of these machines being used worldwide. Many people inhale all night, every night. No one has ever (legitimately) reported inhaling lye.
I have seen where people report the FEAR of inhaling lye and for them I say… TEST THE WATER. Using an inexpensive Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) meter and start with 0 TDS (distilled) water, and see for yourself that the TDS does not significantly rise in the Drinking Water Bubbler.
Note that the ExW portion of Brown’s Gas will add electrons to the water that will cause SOME rise in the TDS reading that is NOT lye.
LONG before water has ‘too much’ lye, you will SMELL the ‘skunky’ or TASTE the ‘funky’. If the water smells/tastes good, it is good.
The water in the Humidifier effectively traps any residual lye (you’ll see the TDS in the Humidifier gradually rise).
Further a pinch of lye (NaOH) in water is actually healthy and is often used as a ‘buffer’ to adjust (raise) the pH of foods and condiments.
https://www.tomsofmaine.com/our-promise/ingredients/sodium-hydroxide-
If people are not inhaling the Brown’s Gas from the AquaCure, they are only getting 10% of the health gains they could be achieving with this technology.
https://eagle-research.life/about-me/
There is NO safer Brown’s Gas machine in the world. I’ve been selling Brown’s Gas machines since 1986 and in all that time (well over 10,000 sales) not one person has ever been hurt in any way.
And I’m small potatoes… In Asia Brown’s Gas is BIG and commonly used for a variety of applications. Japan even uses it in their health spas.
Studies are showing Brown’s Gas to be the next generation of Water for Health. Therapeutic results exceeding pure hydrogen.
Lye Notes:
Note that water having ‘memory’ of lye is GOOD 🙂
Sodium (Na) IS one of the molecules that the body NEEDS to be healthy.
It is easily ingestible as Sodium Chloride (NaCl or table salt) but is more healthily ingested as NaOH (sodium hydroxide) because as the body removes the Na from table salt, it needs to get rid of the toxic substance Cl (chlorine). When the body removes the Na+ from NaOH, it is left with the hydroxide OH-,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroxide
which is generally neutral in the body (not a poison like chlorine).
NaOH (lye) is often used in food and on food (just like sodium chloride). For example as a pretzel glaze:
NaOH is also used to adjust the pH of municipal drinking water (many people are ALREADY drinking lye):
https://www.denverwater.org/your-water/water-quality/lead/ph
https://www.denverwater.org/your-water/water-quality/lead/ph
So ANY level of NaOH in the water below the threshold of ‘caustic’ is benign and even healthful to drink.
Of course ANYTHING is toxic if you get too much of it. Even hydrogen can suffocate you is that’s ALL you inhale (no oxygen).
Note: People really need to get over their FEAR of lye. Lye (Sodium Hydroxide or NaOH) is one of the most USEFUL and beneficial substances we have.
https://sodiumhydroxide.weebly.com/uses.html
It’s created by nature everytime there is a forest fire and rainwater washes it into waterways to prevent the water from becoming too acid. So nature’s water naturally has lye in it.
People used to ‘make’ their own lye by leaching water through wood ashes.
Lye is generally NOT used to dissolve bodies like in the movies. Potassium hydroxide (KOH) is MUCH better at dissolving bodies. Using NaOH can work but it takes a lot more and a lot longer.
On the ranch we use potassium hydroxide to dissolve animal’s horn buds because sodium hydroxide is far too weak a caustic.
So I’ve been using lye all my life and most people have lye in their homes and don’t even know it. The most common uses are drain cleaner and oven cleaner (which works great on exhaust fan filters and greasy pots too).
Further Uses of NaOH
Beauty Products
https://www.tomsofmaine.com/our-promise/ingredients/sodium-hydroxide-
Chemical matrixectomy
Phenol is commonly used in surgeries for ingrown toenails. It’s used on more severe ingrown toenails that don’t respond to other treatments. The phenol, in the form of trichloroacetic acid, is used to stop the nail from growing back.
A small 2001 studyTrusted Source of 172 people found that 98.8 percent of those who received a chemical matrixectomy with phenol cauterization had successful results.
However, phenol matrixectomy may be falling out of favor. A 2014 paper Trusted Source in the Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association found that sodium hydroxide had fewer complications than phenol as an ingrown toenail treatment.
PubMed
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Sodium-hydroxide
Food Additives
Cosmetics Buffer
Is there Hexavalent Chromium in Brown’s Gas?
Is this deliberate miss-information or just ignorant skeptics postulating/posturing?
I’ve seen several hexavalent chromium (aka chromium 6) comments online and personally feel that this is a good example of Vested Interest suppression.
Here’s an example of a ‘tester’ video. The ‘tester’ assumed that just because the fluid changed color, that hex chromium is present… Ignoring the observed fact that the color was totally in the wrong spectrum. The test was showing presence of something,
but not necessarily hex chromium.
At the very least, a proper scientific test would start by testing the WATER used to make up the electrolytic solution, since most water in the USA is ALREADY contaminated by Hex Chromium.
Then test the electrolyte solution BEFORE it is introduced to the stainless steel electrodes, to eliminate the possibility of Hex Chromium being in the substance being used as the catalyst AND to see if the test is even valid for electrolyte solutions (high acid or alkaline). I would also think that most tests like this one would require a neutral pH to be accurate. Electrolyzer fluid is typically 13 pH and that would certainly affect the test.
Next, any testing protocol that assumes that some other electrode material (like titanium) would NOT produce the indicated reaction should PROVE it by testing the solution from those electrodes too (to see that you don’t get a positive for hex chromium)!
The above test indicated hexavalent chromium but was not done properly.
1.
There was no test to verify that hexavalent chromium wasn’t already in the water BEFORE putting it into the electrolyzer.
2.
There was no verification of pH or temperature (both of which affect the quality of the test).
3.
There was no verification that there wasn’t something else in the solution that would react similar to hexavalent chromium
4.
There was no control (testing from an electrolyzer that had nickel or titanium electrodes).
So the test was invalid.
I have yet to see a proper test that truly indicates hexavalent chromium presence.
I have recently had the Brown’s Gas itself (from the AquaCure AC50) AND Brown’s Gas bubbled water tested by a LABORATORY and Lab Verified that there is NO hexavalent chromium!
Vested Interest is VERY good at starting rumors that prevent the public from taking advantage of technologies that would lose them billions of dollars.
In this case, they simply go on a few forums and mention that perhaps because stainless steel has chromium in it, that people should be concerned that there may be hexavalent chromium formed in the electrolyzers that use stainless steel for electrodes.
Or maybe some armchair skeptic just wondered if it’d be possible, and come up with weird theories and/or justifications of how it’d be possible, again with NO SCIENTIFIC testing… In this case, we again have an example of Vested Interest suppression by route of talking heads and/or ‘useful idiots, ignorant of actual facts.
Vested Interest has often gone to considerable lengths to miss-educate ‘educated’ people in public personas and these become the talking heads that the public believes.
Here’s an example of the many lies propagated by Vested Interest miss-education, in this case for automobile mechanics (click).
To continue;
the planted nudge now becomes a rumor or myth that can’t be shaken because people have watched Erin Brockovich
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Brockovich
and know that hexavalent chromium is very bad for health (click) (click) (click).
The Vested Interest knows that they don’t need to prove the rumor false. The onus to prove the rumor false falls on the shoulders of ‘fringe science’ that is easy to discredit. I know this issue intimately because, as an inventor, I CONSTANTLY work on the fringe.
My point is that just because you’ve read or heard some theory (even from scientists) doesn’t make it true.
Let’s walk through some actual facts and my experiences/opinions.
1. I haven’t seen any scientific proof that hexavalent chromium is formed in electrolyzers that use stainless steel plates.
Here is one article that might be relevant, except that (as it points out) the quantities would be minute; and would (as I point out below) stay in the electrolyzer and would be buffered by the lye solution.
For this to happen, even this minutely, the stainless steel would have to corrode, which does not happen in our electrolyzers (designed to last for decades). I’m still using an electrolyzer I built in 1986.
2. Some people have attempted to test for hexavalent chromium but their tests were inconclusive because they really didn’t know how to do the tests properly. Frankly, neither do I; but there are lots of independent labs that do know how and NONE of them have submitted reports of hex chromium in electrolyzer electrolytes that have been used since Michael Faraday ‘invented’ electrolysis ~ 1830.
3. Stainless steel is a ‘food grade’ material, used everywhere in industry and is totally compatible with fluids containing lye (NaOH). In fact, NaOH is RECOMMENDED as a solution to clean stainless steel in food grade applications.
4. Lye (NaOH) is used in many applications of the food industry and comes in a ‘food grade’.
5. Lye solution is a common cleaning fluid for stainless steel pipes.
6. If simple association of lye with stainless steel would cause formation of hexavalent chromium, you can be quite certain we’d have heard about it long before now.
7. In all the OSHA and similar reports I’ve looked at, there is no reference to hexavalent chromium formation in any conditions similar to what exist in a Brown’s Gas electrolyzer, examples: (click) (click) (click).
8. The chromium in stainless steel is NOT hexavalent.
9. It takes very high temperatures (like melting of the steel) to assist the stainless steel chromium to become hexavalent.
10. Stainless steel plates are ‘neutral’ and unreactive (they do NOT normally oxidize or degrade) during ‘normal’ electrolysis (with electrolytes like lye (NaOH).
The above statement is assuming people are not ‘over-driving’ the electrolysis by having a high amperage density on the electrodes. If amperage density causes the electrolysis cell to go above the electro-deposition voltage of the cell, then actual metal can be pulled from the positive electrode (oxidizing anode) and is then (usual electrolysis) deposited on the negative electrode (cathode).
Even so, I haven’t seen any SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that electro-deposition (essentially electroplating) causes hex chromium to form.
11. An ‘oxide layer’ on the anode is normal and is NOT considered to be ‘oxidation’ of the anode. Electrolysis of water NORMALLY creates oxygen on the anode so oxidation of some anode materials is inherent and the oxidized material usually stays ‘attached’ to the anode (does not go out into solution). Nickel and chromium do NOT usually oxidize during normal water electrolysis. Chromium would be an excellent anode material, if it wasn’t so expensive!
12. High pH solutions acts as buffers to absorb and neutralize hexavalent chromium. 25% lye (NaOH) solution has a very high pH. This would automatically render most tests for hex chromium invalid, inadequate and inconclusive.
13. Even if hexavalent chromium is somehow formed, the pH of the electrolyte would act as a buffer to absorb it; thus neutralize/mitigate its health issues. Here are a sampling of the many reports on mitigating/neutralizing hexavalent chromium (click) (click) (click) (click) (click) (click). Reports like this are easy to find by anyone who actually looks.
14. Electrolyzers split water into hydrogen and oxygen (and in our case also make BG). Assuming you are using pure lye and pure water, those gasses are the only ones that form in and leave the electrolyzer. They are non-toxic.
Hex Chromium is NOT a gas and would not come out with the Brown’s Gas, even if it were in the electrolyte.
15. I have several spectrographic analysis reports of Brown’s Gas and NONE of them show anything that could even remotely be construed as hexavalent chromium.
16. Solids/impurities that were in the water or which are formed in the electrolyzer STAY in the electrolyzer. So even if some sort of poison was to form, it’s very unlikely that any solid or liquid impurity in the electrolyzer would present a health risk.
17. Brown’s Gas (aka BG or HHO) that is formed in an electrolyzer has (according to reports from my customers) been curing cancer (and many other maladies).
18. I’m thinking that if BG contained something that caused cancer that I wouldn’t be hearing reports of how Brown’s Gas CURED cancer in virtually every case it’s been tried.
19. I’ve been drinking BG bubbled water since June of 2005. I used to catch colds in the winter and now that only happens when I stop drinking the BG bubbled water.
I’ve been breathing BG gas directly (for at least 4 hours and up to 8 hours every day) since March of 2016 and have noted ONLY positive health effects.
20. ObamaCare, for example, is a program that uses government influence to set up a perfect money making environment for big Pharma and the medical establishment, who have a VESTED INTEREST in keeping you sick and suppressing any kind of actual cures for disease. Health isn’t profitable.
21. These Vested Interest WANT YOU SICK (click) because they make money when you are sick. The longer they can keep you sick, the more money they make. Our ‘health-care’ system has effectively been perverted into a ‘sick-profit’ system that is DESIGNED to mitigate symptoms instead of cure disease. Mitigating the symptoms causes people to think they are well, as the disease continues to progress until it kills them.
22. There are MANY inexpensive and effective cures for most diseases that are actively and often viciously suppressed by the medical community.
People are just becoming aware of the health benefits of BG (HHO) and we are now seeing the Vested Interest doing their suppression of this technology. The hex chromium myth is one of the rumors designed to cause people to shy away from BG(HHO).
23. Note that while Doctors are usually well intentioned people, they have a Vested Interest sponsored education, which trains them to be drug pushers. They are specifically NOT trained to cure disease and can actually lose their license to practice if they DO start curing diseases.
24. Lye solution (the electrolyzer’s electrolyte) is totally environmentally compatible. Lye is made from wood ashes, which form during forest fires. When a rain comes after a forest fire, tons of lye are washed into streams and lakes. Nature absorbs and uses the lye to propagate itself.
25. Lye has also traditionally (for hundreds of years) been used as a household drain cleaner and to make soap. There is NO issue about pouring the lye solutions down the drain. Many people consume lye on a daily basis without even knowing it.
In conclusion: I believe the hexavalent chromium rumor to be a myth-information presented by ‘Vested Interest’ and propagated by ‘useful idiots’; now that BG (HHO) has become a potential threat to their billions of dollars in ‘health’ income.
FAQ: Have been doing some more research and found out about hexavalent chromium produced? from electrolysis of stainless steel https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/59305/production-of-hexavalent-chromium-during-electrolysis-using-a-stainless-steel-as What are your thoughts on this?
Hexavalent chromium cannot be produced with our electrolyzers, because the necessary voltage doesn’t exist. If anyone anywhere says that hexavalent chromium is produced with alkaline electrolysis, they are likely mistaken.
https://eagle-research.com/is-there-hexavalent-chromium-in-browns-gas/
And one of the comments said that dumping lye (NaOH) down the drain is illegal. That’s not entirely true. Small amounts of lye are not only allowed but encouraged because MOST drain cleaners are mostly lye AND the alkaline helps neutralize the acids in the sewage. Further, NaOH is TOTALLY NATURAL to the environment. One of the major ways lye is ‘made’ is to rinse water through wood ashes, then evaporate off the water, leaving the lye behind. In other words, when there is a forest fire, TONS of lye is created, which flows (using rain) into the soils and waterways. Lye is NEEDED by all living things. Small amounts of Lye is not considered toxic waste.
Debate with Jim Wilson…
I appreciate your study submission and thus see the reasoning that you use to nickel plate your electrodes, particularly the anode, where electrode-corrosion occurs.
I did not think it was possible to create Hexavalent Chromium (Cr6+) using electrolysis… And frankly still remain skeptical but open to learning.
It’s my current understanding that the conditions required to FORM Hexavalent Chromium don’t exist in an electrolyzer. Even with relatively pure and finely ground Chromium and using a catalyst, the use of over 600°F (up to 700°F) is required. Electrolyzers do not exceed 212°F because at that point water boils and ‘cools’ the electrolyzer.
https://www.freepatentsonline.com/1926758.pdf
As for the implication that there is Hexavalent Chromium in the Brown’s Gas (HHO) of an electrolyzer without nickel coated electrodes I have three responses:
1. I have spectrographic analysis of Brown’s Gas that show ZERO Hexavalent Chromium<a href=”https://eagle-research.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Browns-Gas-Spectroscopy.pdf” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>Browns’s Gas Spectroscopy</a>
2. If this cancer causing ingredient was in the gas, all the scientific studies and case studies that show Brown’s Gas mitigates cancer would be false.
You cannot ‘cure’ cancer with a cancer causing ingredient, thus it isn’t there…
3. I’ve been handling electrolyzer lye solution (skin contact) since 1986, drinking the Brown’s Gas bubbled water since 2005 and inhaling the Brown’s Gas from my electrolyzers for a MINIMUM of 4 hours a day (up to 10 hours) since March of 2016. And I’m MUCH healthier than I was… So is everyone around me and thousands of my customers…
So I’m thinking thisHexavalent Chromium ‘potential’ is more fear mongering. I’m not saying this against your research, just that I’ve known of this ‘rumor’ for more than a decade and don’t yet see ANY legitimate reason to be concerned.
That said, I acknowledge that it’s possible to ‘make’ it be there, if you use inappropriate experiments, designs or procedures that ‘create’ it or concentrate it from other sources.
AND, I have no objection to nickel coating electrodes, particularly the anode, because it IS a good idea when you are over-driving (too much amperage density) your electrodes…
But if you are going for the BEST anode material, why aren’t you using Platinum? Using nickel seems to be a cost cutting compromise that undermines your stated philosophy.
Let’s examine the study you submitted… Which I see was copyrighted by YOU (Hydrogen Technologies)…
<a href=”https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360319920301403″ target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360319920301403</a>
So I note there is a conflict of interest. Also note that I paid $35 to see this study, so I’m assuming that posting it in public view would contravene copyright intentions.
And, based on my decades of electrolyzer research, development and optimization, the study parameters show some important deficiencies leading to (perhaps) inappropriate conclusions.
The study has some flaws that (in my opinion) skew it’s conclusions into inappropriateness…
I think the Elsevier editors needed to choose better peer-reviewers.
Virtually ALL water now contains some Hexavalent Chromium, even deionized water. I see that you did not use distilled water in this study…
You also did not test (or show that you tested) theCr6+ in the water BEFORE adding it to the electrolyzers.
If there is Hexavalent Chromium in the water put into the electrolyzer, it tends to STAY in the electrolyzer, because the Oxygen and Hydrogen output is pure. All impurities will, over time, concentrate in the electrolyzer.
I note that it is possible for ANY impurity to exit the electrolyzer, riding out in water moisture droplets. Which you appropriately address in your electrolyzers by keeping the electrolyzer temperature LOW (less water moisture in the gas)… BUT, lower temperatures would ALSO mitigate Hexavalent Chromium ‘production’…
You also do not detail how much water was consumed in the process of the experiment, or the efficiency of the test electrolyzer, thus no way to estimate how much Hexavalent Chromium may have been ‘concentrated’ (from the water charge).
I’m also ASSUMING that your power supply was somehow amperage limited, but this is also not described in your study; and it’s vital to describe how you address amperage-runaway (the propensity of the electrolyte to lose resistance as it heats up) because that affects amperage flow and thus gas production, electro-deposition, etc.
As for your Hexavalent Chromium testing technique… There is also no evaluation of the effect NaOH has on the titration of Cr6 to Cr3, or the effect that dissolved oxygen has on the titration; thus I cannot (yet) accept the ’test’ results as accurate. For such titration I’d like to see the NaOH removed first or some sort of study showing that the existence of NaOH in the solution has no effect on the titration test.
That said, I acknowledge that the test should at least compare the relative volumes of Cr.
And I don’t see an evaluation of ‘which’ Cr ions exist in the solution… Because whileHexavalent Chromium is cancer causing,… Other forms of Cr are not. And you keep referring to Cr6+ as if it is ALL Cr6, without defining how much Cr is Cr6.
But stipulating that the test is at least ‘comparative’, your “Table 1 – Cr6+ concentrations in the samples” is impressive.
If true, you’ve demonstrated that if you seriously over-drive an electrolyzer that has stainless steel electrodes, you can get a 23x higher concentration of Cr6+ …
But you also demonstrated that even your nickel plated electrodes cause a Cr6+ concentration that exceeds carcinogenic standards, just not as much… And this is after only 70 hours.
My electrolyzers have run hundreds of thousands of hours in therapeutic application WITHOUT causing any cancer in anyone, ever. In fact, just the opposite. Cancer is mitigated every single time… And this is with ordinary stainless steel electrodes… But they are NOT ‘over-driven’.
Next…
Amperage (not voltage) causes electrolysis (splitting of water).
If using higher amperage (thus higher amperage density) more water is ‘electrolyzed’ and thus more of the Hexavalent Chromium would naturally concentrate.
This natural concentration of ambient Hexavalent Chromium would lead to the inappropriate conclusions that
1.Hexavalent Chromium can be made using electrolysis and
2. higher voltage potential (actually higher amperage) creates MOREHexavalent Chromium.
Further…
You do not seem to understand (from this study) that while ‘over-potential’ above the electro-deposition voltage of the electrode material is a factor of electrode-corrosion, the LARGER factor is amperage density! This factor was not addressed.
I’ve discovered, with stainless steel, if you keep the amperage density lower than 0.5 amps per square inch, electro-corrosion doesn’t happen, thus no ‘potential’ forHexavalent Chromium from the anode material. If the amperage density is kept low enough, even iron works for electrodes, no need for stainless steel to prevent electrode-corrosion.
For example, in one of our ER1200 WaterTorch (Brown’s Gas electrolyzer) using 304 stainless steel, our electrodes weigh 19 lbs. After 4 years of operation, a minimum of 8 hours a day, using the SAME electrolyte solution, the electrodes STILL weighed 19 lbs. ZERO electro-corrosion. This is not theory, this is ‘real life’.
While your study doesn’t detail the electrode sizes, your voltage charts show that you are SERIOUSLY over-driving’ your electrodes (in this experiment) using amperage densities far exceeding 0.5 amp per square inch.
As far as the electrolyte showing a ‘yellowish color’ after being used for hours in an electrolyzer, and your statement of “The electrolyte showed a yellowish color”, which you attributed to the generation of hexavalent chromium (Cr6+)…
Jim… You ARE aware that the color of NaOH is yellow when burned? It’s its natural spectrometric color.
It’s very unlikely that the change from transparent (fresh) electrolyte to yellow (conditioned) electrolyte has anything to do with Hexavalent Chromium.
Just think… BOTH your experiments had the electrolyte turn yellow… And NEITHER contained enoughHexavalent Chromium to cause a yellow tint that cannot be more simply explained.
I also note that your pictures were not appropriate, not directly comparable, should have been side by side in the same containers and with the same background.
If it is Chromium that is causing the electrolyte to be yellow, why does it also turn yellow even when electrodes that contain NO Chromium (like iron or titanium) are used?
Why, once it is thoroughly conditioned, does the electrolyte not continue to get ‘yellower’? I’m still using electrolyte that I mixed in 1986, and it’s the same yellow as a newly conditioned electrolyte mixture.
Further… Even if we stipulate that Chromium ions are pulled from the anode, it is an ion that would immediately try to deposit itself (electroplate) on the cathode, not remain in solution. For Chromium to remain stable in solution, it would need to be electrically neutral and your study does not address how that could happen.
I feel that your study is also seriously deficient by not addressing the design of electrolyzers (like mine) that have stainless steel plates and use LOW amperage density to prevent electro-corrosion.
Further, I DO acknowledge that there are metallic elements in the electrolyte solution, that are the same as the elements of the electrodes, this ’sludge’ builds up in the electrolyzer and needs periodic cleaning… BUT… In a properly designed, operated and maintained Brown’s Gas electrolyzer, the sludge doesn’t come from electrode-corrosion. The electrodes remain intact! Here we’d skew into a ’transmutation’ conversation.
And I don’t see you mentioning Electrically Expanded Water (ExW) at all… And I see you making a AquaCure lookalike that is based on SPE/PEM technology (cannot make Brown’s Gas thus no ExW).
So I conclude that you do not understand ExW and it’s therapeutic potential, or you’d never bother with pure hydrogen… Currently, ongoing studies are showing Brown’s Gas (containing ExW) to be 30% more therapeutically efficacious over pure hydrogen (without ExW).
In the end, while your study is a good start, there are many holes that would need to be filled before I’d consider it’s conclusions to be accurate. At most it’s a good step in the right direction, but it also is biased against (doesn’t address) appropriate use of uncoated stainless steel as electrodes.
And, since you are implying that uncoated stainless steel electrodes are ‘bad’ for health… You’d need to somehow address the amazing heath benefits that electrolyzers using uncoated stainless steel electrodes are having, without any indication of negative effects of Hexavalent Chromium.
Jim, I acknowledge that you are an excellent engineer, knowledgeable and well intentioned. You build beautiful machines.But none of us know ‘everything’ and I feel we’d do well to cooperate.
I’m pretty sure I know things that you do not, from my decades of R&D, and subsequent preliminary evaluations of your designs and literature.
For a lot of what’s ‘out there’, I’ve been there, done that and LEARNED things beyond the ‘state of art’. For example, MY designs of electrolyzers can produce Brown’s Gas at 0.9 watt-hour per SATP liter of gas produced. Few can do that.
Likely you know things that I do not. A technical collaboration would likely assist us both.
I WANT you to succeed, I consider you to be a peer, not competition. I would like to help you create the world’s BEST Brown’s Gas technology.
The world needs this technology and I want to HELP the manufacturers that are producing SAFE quality (preferably also therapeutically efficacious) machines.
There are too many cheap ‘me too’ manufacturers out there, providing unsafe options that unsuspecting and sometimes desperate people will buy, not knowing the difference.
I acknowledge that your machines are built with every quality measure you think appropriate and I applaud that.
But they are NOT (in my opinion) as efficient, safe, functional or therapeutically efficacious as they could be.
I also think I have practical experience that would benefit you.
I propose a collaboration.
I can be reached via my website contact page
https://eagle-research.com/contact
May the blessings be
George
BROWN’S GAS HEALTH ENHANCEMENT
Please explain simply and comprehensibly – BG Gas and its positive effects on health – to a 15-year-old student.
Simple and comprehensive are diametrically opposed.
A comprehensive explanation requires many hours to explain and will still leave questions unanswered.
A simple explanation is all I have time for here. Giving links so you can do a self-study.
The average body is 62% hydrogen, 24% oxygen, 12% carbon and 2% everything else (by volume).
Hydrogen is involved, directly or indirectly in every chemical process in the body.
So hydrogen is our most important MACRO-NUTRIENT, which has been ignored until now. Hydrogen is a FOOD!
The well touted vitamins and minerals are all micro-nutrients compared to hydrogen.
We cannot just breathe in hydrogen like oxygen, because hydrogen does not exist ‘free’ in nature.
We normally get our hydrogen from our food. Most of our ‘foods’ foods contain ‘hydro-carbons’ (a mixture of hydrogen and carbon).
Our digestion system prepares our food (acids, enzymes, etc.) and then specialized bacteria in the Colon complete the process of ‘digestion’ releasing the hydrogen… Which then goes directly into the bloodstream through the walls of the intestines.
Betcha didn’t know you ‘breathe’ in your guts 🙂
By using antibiotics, artificial sweeteners and other chemicals in our food, we’ve decimated our hydrogen-producing bacteria. So, most people are NOT getting enough hydrogen to stay healthy.
Without sufficient hydrogen we become ’starved’ even if we eat plenty of food. De-hydrated in the most basic sense.
Our bodies are AMAZING organic machines. We have built in ‘safety mechanisms’ to preserve life. Like how the blood flow is shut off to the extremities to preserve core temperature when the body is threatened with hyopthermia.
The hydrogen starvation causes the body to shut off extraneous (not immediately life threatening) functions in order to preserve life, starting with the regeneration system (so we scar and age) and then features of the immune system (so we get sick and auto-immune disease). Then start to shut down organs (and we die)…
Thus, by not taking care of our guts properly, eating so many ‘chemicals’ and the modern miracle of antibiotics, we have doomed ourselves to slow and painful aging and death.
But there is now hope for healthful joyous living… Hydrogen supplementation… Particularly if you also add ExW.
If provided enough hydrogen on a daily basis, most bodies will repair their organs, reactivate their immune systems and regeneration systems. This does take TIME, as the cells regenerate, each new generation healthier as they get enough hydrogen.
So (with me after I started Brown’s Gas inhalation) my heart, eyes and skin healed (organs that were struggling). I’d had a heart murmur, wore glasses for 50 years and In more recent years I’d lost the feeling in the palm of my left hand and on both shins (neuropathies).
Now my heart murmur is gone, I don’t wear glasses anymore and I have full feeling back in my hand and legs.
Then my warts (a virus) disappeared. My immune systems got strong enough to kick out hand warts and a planter’s wart I had on my foot. So my immune systems came back online.
And then my scars (which are patches instead of healing) disappeared… THAT was a WOW moment… Because to do that meant that (even though I’m over 60 years old) my body’s stem cells have been reactivated!
Science is proving that virtually all ailments are caused by or exacerbated by…Lack of Hydrogen! People are ‘de-hydrated’ in the most basic sense of the word.
Caveat: When inhaling Brown’s Gas, at first supplement SLOWLY. A few minutes a couple or three times a day. Increasing by a couple of minutes every day until you are breathing HydrOxy for about 20 minutes three times a day. After that you should be able to breathe as much as you want, there’s no toxic limit because once the blood is saturated with hydrogen, you breathe OUT as much as you breathe IN.
The reason you start slow is because hydrogen is a FOOD and you’ve been STARVING for a long time. If you were fasting for a month (from regular food), you wouldn’t start eating again with a 9 course meal (you’d get sick). You’d start with a little bowl of soup. Same thing here.
Science is also showing a 30% to 50% healthful life extension with hydrogen supplementation.
There are now MANY ways to supplement with hydrogen, so which is best? I answer that with this blog:
In my opinion, Brown’s Gas (HydrOxy or HHO) is the best hydrogen for health gas mixture because it also contains oxygen (to balance the hydrogen) and ExW (to provide the ENERGY the body needs to heal).
And of the Brown’s Gas machines, I believe the AquaCure to be the best because:
1. It is a high quality, well priced, practical electrolyzer, designed from over 30 years of electrolyzer building experience. Built by a company with well established customer service.
2. It is the safest Brown’s Gas electrolyzer on the planet (important when working with a combustible gas)
3. It is designed to conveniently do all 5 of my hydrogen for health protocols
Really GOOD question! A question that should have been asked by doctors and scientists decades ago.
It’s now been asked and answered by science… And the answer was hidden in plain sight…
You mostly get it from your food.
Most ‘foods’ are hydrocarbons. The ‘hydro’ part means hydrogen. When you eat hydrocarbons, there is an amazing process to split your food apart into it’s atomic constituents, freeing the hydrogen from the carbons. MOST of this ‘digestion’ is done by ‘good’ bacteria and the ones that make the most hydrogen live in your colin.
You DEPEND on these bacteria to provide the hydrogen you need for healing, health and long life. The freed hydrogen then enters your bloodstream through your intestinal wall.
Yes, you’ve never heard this before, your Doctor likely doesn’t even know it and (quite frankly) I’ve found that I know more about nutrition than hospital dietitians. NO ONE knows or teaches how you naturally get your MOST IMPORTANT NUTRIENT! About 62% of YOU is hydrogen!
ALSO, what most people MISS is an additional side effect of antibiotics… Antibiotics KILL ALL bacteria in your guts, which shuts down your natural hydrogen production, creating an ‘invisible asthma’ (not getting hydrogen like an asthmatic not getting oxygen). Thus the ‘miracle’ of antibiotics is a double edged sword and one of the reasons that lifespans have DECREASED in the last few decades!
This is one of the main reasons that hydrogen supplementation (and particularly BG breathing) is SO NEEDED and EFFECTIVE! People have been taking antibiotics and eating franken-foods, killing the natural hydrogen production that the body needs for it’s immune system and to rebuild itself on an ongoing basis. Thus people are getting sick and aging far sooner than they should be.
The body also has the ability to get hydrogen from many other chemical processes too, but these are ’emergency’ measures and usually require huge energy draws from the body’s resources. People that are sick do not have the energy reserves to ‘make’ hydrogen (from water) so decline in health and die.
This is why the ExW component in BG is SO IMPORTANT! ExW contains the exact kind of energy that the body needs to LIVE. And when it gets enough of this energy, it can ‘spend’ some of it on lower priority health issues, like scar removal and hair growth.
Whooo… That’s a short question with a loooong answer.
First, there are now MANY ‘hydrogen’ technologies that you can choose from. None are ‘bad’ but most are not ‘optimal’, selling you more hype than effectiveness.
There are ‘older’ technologies that ‘accidentally’ used hydrogen supplementation to be effective like colloidal silver, ‘flow-through’ electrolyzers (that are now ‘re-positioning’ themselves as ‘hydrogen generators’ instead of ‘high pH’) and Brown’s Gas (which wasn’t originally considered as a ‘health’ gas, it’s a cross-over from being a torch fuel-gas and from enhancing combustion of carbon based fuels)…
To ‘newer’ technologies like magnesium tablets, batch electrolyzers and pure hydrogen generators (pure hydrogen as opposed to the Brown’s Gas trifecta of gasses).
You are going to be hearing a LOT MORE about all these hydrogen technologies in the near future because now that ‘science’ has discovered ‘hydrogen for health’ it is poised to become a Health PHENOMENON as dozens of companies jump on the ‘hydrogen’ bandwagon!!!
1. Bottled Hydrogen, which can be purchased from your local welding supply store. example 1, example 2… Lots of people and scientific studies use this simple, straightforward solution.
There are two reasons I don’t.
First, convenience. It takes time, money, storage rent and handle bottles.
Second, effectiveness. BG is a more theraputic gas because of it’s trifecta (read more below).
Flow through electrolyzers make what they call Electrically Reduced Water (ERW) which does not contain the trifecta constituents of BG, (pretty much only the hydrogen), so you do not get the advantages of the Electrically Expanded Water (ExW) or oxygen.
And (Vitally Important) you cannot breathe the gas generated by an ionizer, you can ONLY do the drinking and soaking protocols… So the health benefits are severely limited.
The flow through electrolyzers also do not totally CLEAN the water of impurities, in fact they USE the impurities in the water to ‘function’ (you can’t do electrolysis in pure water). They use electrical fields and electrical conductivity (of impure water) to separate the water’s ‘acid’ constituents from the ‘alkaline’ constituents; supposedly making ‘healthy alkaline‘ water.
What they were actually making (without even knowing it) was hydrogen rich water (HRW); because the electrolysis was splitting some of the water into hydrogen and oxygen, the hydrogen being added to the ‘cathode’ water (which was incidentally higher pH).
.
The ‘high pH’ myth-understanding (and subsequent 40 year myth-promotion by ionizer companies) has now been scientifically proven false.
.
A scientific study removed the hydrogen but kept the pH and the health benefits disappeared. They then took away the high pH and left the hydrogen and the health benefits remained. Quite frankly, they made an assumption that it was the pH that was giving the health gains and it was a mistake that has caused a ‘high pH’ fad. You can read more about it here:
.
These ‘flow-through’ electrolyzers (often called ionizers’) have the electrode metal in contact with the fluid you are going to drink.
This is particularly important because of something called ‘electro-deposition’ where metal is electrically removed from one electrode (the anode) and deposited on another electrode (the cathode).
If the fluid (you drink) is ‘flowing’ between the electrodes then some of that metal (as micro-ions) actually flows out with your drinking water.
So the ionizer companies try to mitigate this effect by using materials with very high electro-deposition voltages. Where the voltage has to be very high before it will start tearing metal from the electrodes.
Metals like platinum (if high quality) or titanium (less quality). Electro-deposition happens at higher cell voltages, which the AquaCure (none of my design of electrolyzers) does NOT have. We use a catalyst that keeps the cell voltages very low, under the electro-deposition voltage of our 316L stainless steel electrodes, so our electrodes do not degrade and even if they did, the ‘material’ would stay in the machine, not come out with the gas.
The ionizer companies try to mitigate this degradation by using materials with high electro-deposition voltages (like titanium and platinum) to make their electrodes (plates) but it still happens.
.
They’ve also mistakenly (for decades) assumed and promoted the high pH (alkaline) water as the reason for the health benefits. This myth has been thoroughly and scientifically disproven.
.
They now know that the pH is not what made the resulting water healthy (due to recent conclusive scientific evidence) and are re-positioning themselves to highlight the hydrogen that was ‘incidentally’ created, put into the water by the electrolysis process and is the ACTUAL reason for the healthful effects.
.
They would still have you believe that the ‘alkaline’ minerals left in the ‘high’ pH water are healthy, but they don’t tell you is that much of that ‘alkaline’ material left in the water is non-bio-available (is essentially unhealthy gunk).
but just because water has a high pH doesn’t automatically make it healthy.
As far as I know, Brown’s Gas does that best, because of it’s hydrogen and ExW components!
Flow through electrolyzers require frequent internal cleanings (because the plates get gunked up) that are best done by total disassembly (usually at factory to maintain warranty).
They also don’t tell you that flow-through ionizers typically have mold buildup in the water output hose. Brown’s Gas electrolyzers do NOT develop mold..
So if you do buy an ionizer, get one that frequently reverses the current across the plates, this technique will keep the plates clean longer. Because as they get dirty, the electrolysis process slows down and stops… eliminating the production of hydrogen. They get ‘dirty’ as impurities in your tap water electro-deposit on the cathode.
.
They also don’t tell you that in order to have electrolysis in tap water, they need to use voltages FAR ABOVE the electrodeposition voltage of most metals, so the electrolyzer plates will fairly quickly dissolve away (into the water you drink).
Titanium is a cheaper but less effective option. Anything less than titanium shouldn’t be considered for ionizing technology (you’d just be wasting your money on a very short lived machine and poisoning yourself).
.We use a totally different electrolysis technology, now called ‘integrated dry cell’. Which we optimize to keep the cell voltages low (using a catalyst) and thus we do NOT have the electrode decomposition.
Further, ANY impurities stay in the electrolyzer (only pure gas comes out as proven by spectrographic tests) so you’ll have NO negative health effects from impurities.
Colloidal silver solution is a very good antibiotic but… (what most people don’t realize) the manufacturing process ALSO puts Brown’s Gas into the water because colloidal silver is ‘made’ using batch electrolysis in a single cell without a membrane (simple BG electrolyzer).
2. The magnesium hydroxide is then neutralized by the organic acids leaving magnesium ions and their conjugate bases (Mg(OH)2 + malic acid/tartaric acid — Mg2+ + malate + tartrate). Here is a DIY video.
1. that if you do too many of these tablets you could develop hypermagnesemia (magnesium poisoning) and
2. depending on the technique used some of the magnesium turns into magnesium oxide, which is also a poison and
3. if impure magnesium is used (like some coming from China) you could get heavy metal poisoning and
4. the ongoing purchase of enough tablets to get you healthy and keep you healthy gets accumulatively expensive.
In addition, magnesium tablets do not make ExW and you can’t ‘breathe’ the gas.
http://www.wiredchemist.com/chemistry/data/solubilities-gases
= 0.00016… x10 = 0.0016 grams of hydrogen per liter (1000 grams) of waterAccording to the Ideal Gas Law, 1 mole of any ideal gas at STP, or standard temperature and pressure, takes up 22.4 liters of space. Therefore, at STP, 6.022 * 10^23 molecules take up 22.4 liters of space.
1 mole of H2 = 2 grams = 22.4 liters at STP22.4 * 0.0016 = 0.03584 STP liters of hydrogen stored in water.So according to this math, 1 liter of water can normally ’store’ about 36 cc of gaseous hydrogen,
assuming the ambient pressures, temperatures and partial gas pressure conditions.If you are BREATHING hydrogen at 4% in the intake breath (and for me that is about 12 lph),
That’s breathing a liter (1000 cc’s) every 5 minutes, or 3 cc’s per second or 36 cc about every 12 seconds of intake breath.So 12 seconds of breathing hydrogen gives me as much hydrogen as drinking a liter of hydrogen saturated water.
Two ‘other’ severe disadvantages of PEM/SPE membranes are:
1. you cannot allow them to freeze, EVER. The water in them is pure and if allowed to freeze even once, the expanding ice destroys the membrane.
2. they MUST use exotic metals (like platinum or Iridium) with really high electrodeposition voltages because those metals are in direct contact with the water you are drinking… If the metal decomposes under the stress of electrolysis, that metal is now in the water you are drinking.
Note that titanium is NOT good enough for this type of electrolyzer.
On the other hand, simple stainless steel is fine for Brown’s Gas electrolyzers because (if they are designed properly) the cell voltages are under the electro-deposition voltage of iron, so the electrodes do not decompose and ANY impurities are left in the electrolyzer anyway.
It IS CORRECT that you do not want the poisonous impurities in your water…
BUT is NOT CORRECT that you want ONLY hydrogen in your water.
NO PEM/SPE electrolyzer can make Brown’s Gas. By design there is a ‘membrane’ (the SPE) between the electrodes that prevents the production of ExW portion of Brown’s Gas.
Many of the PEM/SPE electrolyzer manufacturer’s CLAIM to be making Brown’s Gas because their machines make 66% Hydrogen and 33% oxygen.
And they DO make 66% Hydrogen and 33% oxygen
But that doesn’t make it Brown’s Gas. Their machine makes PURE H2 and PURE O2 in a (if you recombine them) 2:1 ratio. It’s like combining H2 and O2 from bottles.
Brown’s Gas, while being 66.66% Hydrogen and 33.33% Oxygen, is NOT pure H2 and O2. The hydrogen and oxygen are present in 6 different constituents, as detailed here:
What is Browns Gas (BG)
The main difference is that Brown’s Gas contains ExW and pure oxygen-hydrogen mixtures do not.
https://eagle-research.com/what-is-exw-and-why-does-it-matter/
The ‘reason’ the ‘pure hydrogen for health’ advocates often chose to throw away the oxygen is because of cheap methods of measuring hydrogen in water, using inexpensive meters and even less expensive tritiation.
And throwing away the oxygen is just ‘stupid’ (in my opinion) because you need that TOO, to balance out the hydrogen in the breathing gas.
example1 example2 example3 example4
I went to LEDs because they were 6 times more efficient than incandescent.
BG is like that… Anyone using one of the above 7 technologies is NOT optimizing their health benefits.
I just try to be honest and (as you can see above) show you the options ‘out there’. I’m in a position to enhance my own health AND that of millions of people, so I’m doing it the best way I know how.
If built entirely in the USA, I’d have to retail an equivalent at $5000. By using a VING as the chassis, I can retail it for $2500. Do not think that because the AquaCure looks like a VING, that it is a VING… It is NOT!
In the meantime, the BG supplementation is still important because of the ExW, which provides an ‘electrical’ energy to the body, which the body can use to heal ills.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-mom-baby-good-bacteria-breast.html
One of the many practical applications for Brown’s Gas (HHO) is Health Enhancement. From ER50 electrolyzer customer feedback testimonials I see the potential is ASTOUNDING!
I’ve answered the question “How I use BG for Health” . I refer you to there so there is just one place that I need to update when new information is available.
ABOUT OUR WEBSITE
All Eagle-Research products are sold with a 100% Satisfaction Guarantee.
If you are dissatisfied for any reason, you can return the product(s), in resaleable condition, within 60 days (or longer if that is on the sales page) of receipt of the product(s) for a full refund of the product(s) purchase price.
Shipping and handling fees are non-refundable. Virtual Products are non-refundable after initial download.
To return a product, use the ‘contact page‘ eMail to inform us of
1. who you are,
2. order details (enough detail for us to find your order),
3. what you’d like to return and
We will send your Return Merchandise Authorization (RMA) number and shipping instructions.
Please follow the instructions precisely to assure a smooth refund.
FULL Disclaimer for our information and products:
The statements in this website (and made by George Wiseman) have not been evaluated or approved by the AMA, ATF, CIA, CDC, DEA, DHS, DOD, DOE, EPA, FCC, FDA, FEC, FBI, FTC, HHS, ICC, INS, IRS, NIH, NSA, NSC, OGA, WEF, WHO, ETC.
~ Just assume what we have to say isn’t approved by ANY world organization, government agency, medical organization or pharmaceutical company.
Products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult an appropriate (preferably not WOKE) physician before using our products.
The information provided on this site is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for advice from your physician or other health care professional or any information contained on or in any product label or packaging.
You should not use the information on this site for diagnosis or treatment of any health problem or for prescription of any medication or other treatment.
Always consult with an appropriate healthcare professional before starting any diet, exercise or supplementation program, before taking any medication, or if you have or suspect you might have a health problem
You should not stop taking any medication without first consulting your health care professional.
As individuals differ, so will results. Even though we use ONLY natural ingredients, always check with your doctor for risks associated with dietary supplements and your specific health conditions and/or allergies.
For legal reasons we need to state up front that the AquaCure is not yet defined as a medical device and therefor cannot legally be recommended for human use.
See this link for more information.
Legal uses would be for plants, fish, birds and other mammals.
Hundreds of scientific studies have proven that it is safe for plants and animals to use for drinking and breathing.
Current studies are proving that humans are having all the same benefits proven on Plants and Animals.
Note: A study of all the studies (including on humans) shows NO negative side effects of hydrogen, only positive benefits.
Who we are
Our website address is: https://www.aquacure.life.
What personal data we collect and why we collect it
Comments
When visitors leave comments on the site we collect the data shown in the comments form, and also the visitor’s IP address and browser user agent string to help spam detection.
An anonymized string created from your email address (also called a hash) may be provided to the Gravatar service to see if you are using it. The Gravatar service privacy policy is available here: https://automattic.com/privacy/. After approval of your comment, your profile picture is visible to the public in the context of your comment.
Media
If you upload images to the website, you should avoid uploading images with embedded location data (EXIF GPS) included. Visitors to the website can download and extract any location data from images on the website.
Contact forms
Cookies
If you leave a comment on our site you may opt-in to saving your name, email address and website in cookies. These are for your convenience so that you do not have to fill in your details again when you leave another comment. These cookies will last for one year.
If you have an account and you log in to this site, we will set a temporary cookie to determine if your browser accepts cookies. This cookie contains no personal data and is discarded when you close your browser.
When you log in, we will also set up several cookies to save your login information and your screen display choices. Login cookies last for two days, and screen options cookies last for a year. If you select “Remember Me”, your login will persist for two weeks. If you log out of your account, the login cookies will be removed.
If you edit or publish an article, an additional cookie will be saved in your browser. This cookie includes no personal data and simply indicates the post ID of the article you just edited. It expires after 1 day.
Embedded content from other websites
Articles on this site may include embedded content (e.g. videos, images, articles, etc.). Embedded content from other websites behaves in the exact same way as if the visitor has visited the other website.
These websites may collect data about you, use cookies, embed additional third-party tracking, and monitor your interaction with that embedded content, including tracking your interaction with the embedded content if you have an account and are logged in to that website.
Analytics
Who we share your data with
How long we retain your data
If you leave a comment, the comment and its metadata are retained indefinitely. This is so we can recognize and approve any follow-up comments automatically instead of holding them in a moderation queue.
For users that register on our website (if any), we also store the personal information they provide in their user profile. All users can see, edit, or delete their personal information at any time (except they cannot change their username). Website administrators can also see and edit that information.
What rights you have over your data
If you have an account on this site, or have left comments, you can request to receive an exported file of the personal data we hold about you, including any data you have provided to us. You can also request that we erase any personal data we hold about you. This does not include any data we are obliged to keep for administrative, legal, or security purposes.
Where we send your data
Visitor comments may be checked through an automated spam detection service.
The internet seems to be deleting emails to and from eagle-research.
I’m working on getting that corrected but in the meantime, here’s how you can help yourself.
Instructions to Whitelist Eagle-Research.com
BTW, I have another communication method which you can use.
You can log into your ER user account and send me private messages directly on my website, so there is NO actual email.
I get the message as soon as I log into my account, which I do nearly everyday.
So you’d log in at
https://www.eagle-research.com/cms/user
Then go to your account, (see MY ACCOUNT button on upper left sidebar)
Then click on ‘Contact’ in the upper row of links. Your name should already be filled in as the sender and my name as the receiver.